Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a global score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has the previous 14 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
The Moto Z Force features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A16 5G and Motorola Moto Z Force both have similar displays, because although the Galaxy A16 5G has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a way lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A16 5G has a superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.