Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a 77 score against 75.8. Galaxy A20s is a a lot newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A20s has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Moto Z Force features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto Z Force has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and way more pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z Force counts with much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Moto Z Force also has a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy A20s has just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.