Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 has a score of 76.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Even though the Galaxy A22 is notably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A22 has an older 12 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Samsung Galaxy A22 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has 4 more processing cores. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater count of pixels per display inch and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much lower 21 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.