Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is better than the Moto Z Force, getting a score of 84.6 against 75.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is way newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z Force features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a bit better processor than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of 2200 MHz cores. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a much better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.