Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Moto Z Force, with a 79.9 score against 75.8. Galaxy A25 5G's body is noticeably newer than Moto Z Force's, but it's thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way lower pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A25 5G captures better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.