Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 79.6 against 75.8. Galaxy A30's design is notably newer, but a little bit thicker and a little heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force. Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A30, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A30 has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 14% bigger battery size. Moto Z Force takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 21 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.