Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Galaxy A32 LTE Only's design is notably newer and a lot lighter than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it is thicker. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has more cpu cores. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a very superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.