Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 has a score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A34 has 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy A34 design is thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
Galaxy A34 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A34 also has a greater number of cores (and faster). Moto Z Force has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, they both have a same size aperture. The Moto Z Force has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A34, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.