Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. The Galaxy A35 5G construction is much newer, but extremely heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A35 5G has older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Moto Z Force has a lot better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. The Moto Z Force features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.