Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a 79.6 score against 75.8. The Galaxy A40 body is notably newer and lighter, but a little bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A40 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A40, although it has less CPU cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera and a way better video definition.
The Moto Z Force counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.