Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a little bit better than Moto Z Force, having an 81.7 score against 75.8. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A41 has older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Galaxy A41 is a a lot newer and a little lighter cellphone than the Moto Z Force, although it's a bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a larger number of cores. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A41 captures much better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A41 and Moto Z Force both count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.