Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. Although Galaxy A50s is way newer than the Moto Z Force, it is just a little thicker and a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit better CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy A50s features a better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera with a way better resolution. Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A50s features a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.