Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy A51 is a incredibly newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy A51 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A51 also has a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Force features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 captures better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A51 costs a bit more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.