Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 90.8 against 75.8. Galaxy A51 5G is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G features a better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.