Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is way better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone than Moto Z Force, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A52 5G has slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.