Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | -- |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) is slightly better than the Moto Z Force, getting a score of 78.7 against 75.8. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored)'s construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than the Moto Z Force. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Moto Z Force features a better looking screen than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto Z Force has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores.
The Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) captures better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also has a way higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a much longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.