Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. The Moto Z Force design is just a bit thinner than the Galaxy A6, although it is just a bit heavier and was released about a year before. Moto Z Force features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto Z Force features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Moto Z Force, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.