Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Galaxy A70 is a notably newer phone than Moto Z Force, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto Z Force features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images in poorly lited environments, they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. Moto Z Force features just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A70 features better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.