Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | -- |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, having an 80.5 score against 75.8. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has the previous 12 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Despite being the best phone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a a little thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Moto Z Force.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. The Galaxy A73 5G and Moto Z Force feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A73 5G has a much worse screen density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Galaxy A73 5G has just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G features a really longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A73 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A73 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.