Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C5 has an overall score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy C5's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Moto Z Force, even though both of them were only released 3 months apart. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C5 has older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger screen. Moto Z Force has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy C5, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Moto Z Force features a bit better camera than Galaxy C5, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot better (4K) video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.