Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has the older 12 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a extremely newer and a lot lighter phone than Moto Z Force, but it is thicker.
Galaxy F23 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy F23 also has a higher number of cores. The Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto Z Force captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a camera with a much lower 21 mega pixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.