Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has an overall score of 85.2, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Galaxy F41's construction is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto Z Force features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 71% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.