Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Moto Z Force, having a general score of 88.1 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force, although it is noticeably heavier and thicker. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.