Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat, so it provides some extra features and improved performance. Although the Galaxy Fold is heavier than the Moto Z Force, it's just a bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel density.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower video definition and a back facing camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.