Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy M20 design is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Moto Z Force. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a lot better (4K) video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.