Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 82.4 against 75.8. Galaxy M30's design is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than Moto Z Force. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version, giving some additional features.
Moto Z Force features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy M30's processing unit is very similar to Moto Z Force's processing unit, although the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has more RAM and a greater number of cores (but slower).
Motorola Moto Z Force shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos, a way higher 21 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features a superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.