Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although the Samsung Galaxy M51 is much newer than the Moto Z Force, it's incredibly heavier and thicker.
Moto Z Force features a slightly better display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels amount per inch in the display. Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M51 features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy M51 has a much better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.