Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. The Galaxy Note 20 is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Moto Z Force features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.