Search


Compare phones

Global Score
75.880.7
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 MarshmallowAndroid 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3
2016-09-012013-09-04
6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches
5.75 ounces5.93 ounces
Black, Gold and GrayBlack, Pink and White
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 250.00$ 245.00
Display / Screen
5.5 inches5.7 inches
2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K)1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD)
AMOLED Super AMOLED
534 pixels per inch386 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
8.68.8
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipsetSamsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset
Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processorARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM3 GB (800 MHz) RAM
Adreno 530 GPUARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU
99.18
Storage
64 GB internal memory64 GB internal memory
microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
14.669.46
Camera
21.00 MP + 5.00 MP13.00 MP + 2.00 MP
f/1.80 aperturef/2.20 aperture
--31.00mm focal length
--0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor
3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution
1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video
10.019.68
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPALTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA
Nano SIMMicro SIM
5.57.1
Battery Life
3500mAh Battery3200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--Wireless Charging
--490 hours standby time
20 hours talk time
5.445.2
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.1 Bluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
NFCNFC
--Infra-red port
Fingerprint ID Scanner--
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 80.7 against 75.8. Although it's the best device in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a notably older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier device than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.

Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor and 4 more CPU cores. The Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way worse pixels amount per inch of screen and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little larger screen.

The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a camera in the back with a way higher 21 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.

The Moto Z Force features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 9% bigger battery size.

Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto Z Force.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.