Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force, with an 81.2 score against 75.8. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is extremely older, thicker and just a little heavier than Moto Z Force.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display. Moto Z Force counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Moto Z Force has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with a lot better 21 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit more expensive than Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.