Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
VerizonSM-N910V
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Despite being the best we compare here, we must note that it's also older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has the older 5.0 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 features a brighter screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 also counts with a little bit larger screen. Galaxy Note 4 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 4 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Moto Z Force features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 4's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola Moto Z Force, although the Galaxy Note 4 has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a worse video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 costs a bit more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.