Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force, although it is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Moto Z Force and Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition feature very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Moto Z Force has a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger number of cores.
Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also counts with a much better resolution camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 9% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.