Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 construction is noticeably newer than the Moto Z Force's, although it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Galaxy Note10 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and 4 more cores.
Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z Force counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a back camera with way less megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Moto Z Force and the Samsung Galaxy Note10 both count with extremely similar batteries duration.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.