Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than the Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Even though Galaxy Note10 Lite is newer than Moto Z Force, it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels density. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy Note10 Lite takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.