Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the Moto Z Force, getting a 77.7 score against 75.8. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy Note3's body is incredibly older, just a bit heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force.
Galaxy Note3's processing unit is very similar to Moto Z Force's processor, and although the Galaxy Note3 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 4 cpu cores. Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto Z Force takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Moto Z Force features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.