Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, getting a score of 77.6 against 75.8. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 construction is older, thicker and just a bit heavier than Moto Z Force. Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a display that is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z Force one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a little less pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note4's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Motorola Moto Z Force, because although the Galaxy Note4 has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower).
Moto Z Force has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations and a way better 21 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.