Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Even being the best phone in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Moto Z Force also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Moto Z Force features a little better performance than Galaxy Note7. They have 4 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Force features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Force and Galaxy Note7 both have similar batteries duration. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.