Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is way better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a way newer phone than the Moto Z Force, although it's a little thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way less MP back camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos. Motorola Moto Z Force features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.