Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 250.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having an 89.7 score against 75.8. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is much newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more than Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.