Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the Moto Z Force, with an 86.3 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than Moto Z Force. The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Motorola Moto Z Force has slightly more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10e is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.