Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is way better than Moto Z Force, getting a 94.8 score against 75.8. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although the Galaxy S20 is way newer than the Moto Z Force, it is a bit heavier and a little thicker.
Galaxy S20 has a little bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a little larger display and a bit better screen pixel density. Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy S20 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S20 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way higher video quality.
The Galaxy S20 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.