Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Moto Z Force, getting a score of 90.8 against 75.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have the same aperture.
Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.