Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 is way better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with a 91.8 score against 75.8. Although the Galaxy S21 is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S21 has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy S21 counts with a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little worse pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Galaxy S21 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S21 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S21 also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. Moto Z Force counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S21, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Galaxy S21 is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.