Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra is much better than Moto Z Force, getting a 98.1 score against 75.8. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S21 Ultra has the older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Galaxy S21 Ultra is a much newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force, although it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy S21 Ultra features a brighter display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S21 Ultra costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.