Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Galaxy S22's construction is incredibly newer, but just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 has older 13 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a brighter screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy S22 features a very superior camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way better video definition.
The Galaxy S22 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy S22 costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.