Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 95.4 against 75.8. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a extremely newer phone than Moto Z Force, but it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM memory and more processing cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Moto Z Force has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.