Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a 76 score against 75.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has an older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a just a little thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than Moto Z Force.
The Galaxy S24 FE has a little more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way worse quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster). Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a back camera with a lot worse 21 megapixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Although Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.