Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner phone than the Moto Z Force.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25, although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM. The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a camera with way more megapixels and a much better video quality. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.