Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-01 | -- |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter phone than Moto Z Force.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a larger display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations, a much better video definition and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. Moto Z Force features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.