Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 has a global score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S5 is a lot older and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force, it's body is still lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S5 has the older 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy S5 counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S5 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S5 also counts with an additional GPU. The Moto Z Force features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
The Motorola Moto Z Force and the Galaxy S5 feature similar cameras, although the Galaxy S5 has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, a lower video resolution and a lot worse 16 MP resolution back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can get Moto Z Force, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.